Yemen Conflict: US Involvement and Drone Warfare Implications

The Yemen Conflict: A Complex Web of US Involvement

The ongoing conflict in Yemen has been a source of international concern for over a decade. What began as internal strife has evolved into a complex proxy war, with the United States playing a significant role. This article delves into the history of US involvement in Yemen, the controversial use of drone warfare, and the recent escalation of tensions in the region.

The Obama Era: Drone Strikes and Secret Wars

The Birth of the Drone Program

The roots of US military involvement in Yemen can be traced back to the Obama administration. In 2009, President Obama initiated a secret drone bombing campaign in Yemen, primarily targeting Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). This marked the beginning of a new era in warfare, where remote-controlled aircraft could carry out targeted killings without putting American troops in harm's way.

However, the drone program was shrouded in secrecy from its inception. Robert Gibbs, Obama's first press secretary, later revealed on NBC News that he was instructed not to acknowledge the existence of the drone program when questioned by journalists. This level of secrecy raised concerns about transparency and accountability in US foreign policy.

Collateral Damage and Ethical Concerns

The drone strikes in Yemen were not without controversy. Estimates suggest that between 95% and 96% of those killed in these strikes were not the intended targets. This high rate of civilian casualties raised serious ethical questions about the program's effectiveness and moral implications.

One of the most notorious incidents involved the killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen, and his 16-year-old son in separate drone strikes in Yemen. These extrajudicial killings of US citizens without due process sparked outrage and legal debates about the limits of executive power in the war on terror.

The Unintended Consequences

Paradoxically, the drone campaign seemed to strengthen rather than weaken AQAP. The high number of civilian casualties served as a powerful recruitment tool for the terrorist organization. As General Stanley McChrystal noted, the death of innocent civilians often led to radicalization among their family members and communities, swelling the ranks of groups like AQAP.

The Saudi Intervention and US Support

Obama's Pivot to Saudi Arabia

In 2015, the conflict in Yemen took a dramatic turn when Saudi Arabia decided to intervene militarily. The Obama administration, in what was described as an "awkward twist," chose to support the Saudi-led coalition against the Houthi rebels.

This decision was reportedly made to appease Saudi Arabia, which had been displeased with US actions in the region, including the Iraq War and the nuclear deal with Iran. By supporting the Saudi intervention in Yemen, Obama hoped to mend relations with this crucial Middle Eastern ally.

The Humanitarian Crisis

The Saudi-led intervention in Yemen, backed by US support, led to a devastating humanitarian crisis. The coalition imposed a strict blockade around Yemen, already the poorest country in the Middle East. This blockade, combined with airstrikes targeting civilian infrastructure such as farms, wheat silos, and irrigation systems, pushed the country to the brink of famine.

The brutality of the campaign was staggering, with parallels drawn to the recent conflict in Gaza. Hundreds of thousands of Yemenis died, not just from direct violence but also from easily preventable diseases like cholera, as the blockade prevented essential medical supplies from reaching the population.

The Trump Era and America First

Campaign Promises and Reality

Donald Trump campaigned on an "America First" foreign policy, promising to end US involvement in endless wars in the Middle East. He criticized the interventionist policies of previous administrations and pledged to focus on domestic issues.

However, the reality of governance often clashed with campaign rhetoric. While Trump did work towards a ceasefire in Yemen through diplomatic channels, his administration also continued to support Saudi Arabia's actions in the region.

The Houthi Attacks and US Response

The situation in Yemen gained renewed attention when Houthi rebels began attacking shipping lanes in the Red Sea. The Trump administration faced criticism for its response to these attacks, with Trump himself lambasting the idea of using military force as a first resort.

In a short interview with Tim Pool, Trump criticized Joe Biden's decision to bomb Houthi targets in response to attacks on shipping lanes. Trump argued that diplomacy should be the first approach, stating that picking up the phone could often resolve conflicts without resorting to violence.

The Biden Administration and Continued Conflict

Escalation of Tensions

Under the Biden administration, tensions in Yemen have once again escalated. Recent US bombings of Houthi targets have reignited debates about the effectiveness and morality of US military involvement in the region.

Critics argue that these bombings are unlikely to deter the Houthis, who have endured years of conflict and hardship. The strikes also risk further destabilizing the region and alienating potential diplomatic partners.

The Signal Leak and Political Fallout

A recent controversy erupted when details of a private Signal chat involving US officials and politicians were leaked. The chat revealed discussions about bombing targets in Yemen, including an apartment building where a high-value target was believed to be located.

The casual nature of these discussions, with little apparent concern for civilian casualties, shocked many observers. Even supporters of a strong military response, such as Tulsi Gabbard, faced criticism for their apparent lack of moral consideration in these discussions.

The Ethics of Remote Warfare

The Psychological Toll on Drone Operators

The use of drone warfare has introduced a new dimension to the psychological impact of combat on military personnel. Drone operators, while physically removed from the battlefield, often suffer from severe PTSD due to the nature of their work.

Unlike traditional combat scenarios, drone operators observe their targets for extended periods, often getting to know their daily routines and family lives. This intimate knowledge, combined with the act of killing from a distance, can create a unique form of psychological trauma.

The Abstraction of Violence

The use of drones and other remote warfare technologies has, in some ways, abstracted the violence of war. Unlike deploying ground troops or conducting more visible military operations, drone strikes can occur with little public awareness or scrutiny.

This abstraction of violence raises concerns about the ease with which military actions can be taken without full consideration of their consequences or proper public debate.

The Strategic Implications

Questioning the Effectiveness

The repeated bombing campaigns in Yemen raise questions about their strategic effectiveness. Critics argue that these strikes, particularly against the Houthis, are unlikely to achieve their stated goals and may even be counterproductive.

The Houthis have demonstrated resilience in the face of years of conflict and hardship. The idea that limited strikes could break their will or significantly alter their behavior seems optimistic at best.

The Role of Diplomacy

Many experts argue that diplomatic solutions should be prioritized over military action in Yemen. The success of previous ceasefires, negotiated through diplomatic channels, demonstrates that non-violent approaches can be effective in reducing tensions and stopping Houthi attacks on shipping lanes.

The failure to pursue diplomatic options more vigorously represents a missed opportunity for de-escalation and conflict resolution.

The America First Dilemma

Balancing Interests and Values

The ongoing involvement in Yemen presents a challenge to the "America First" foreign policy advocated by some politicians. Critics argue that these military actions prioritize the interests of allies like Saudi Arabia and European trading partners over direct US interests.

The relatively small impact of the Red Sea shipping lanes on US trade compared to European trade has led some to question why the US is taking the lead in military responses to Houthi attacks.

The Cost of Global Policing

The financial and strategic costs of acting as the world's police force are significant. With the US facing domestic challenges and a growing national debt, questions arise about the wisdom of expending resources on conflicts with limited direct impact on US interests.

Conclusion

The US involvement in Yemen, from the Obama-era drone strikes to the recent bombings under the Biden administration, presents a complex picture of foreign policy challenges. It raises fundamental questions about the ethics of remote warfare, the effectiveness of military interventions, and the balance between national interests and global responsibilities.

As the situation in Yemen continues to evolve, policymakers and the public must grapple with these difficult issues. The human cost of the conflict, both to Yemeni civilians and to US military personnel, cannot be ignored. At the same time, the strategic implications of US actions in the region will have long-lasting effects on global geopolitics.

Ultimately, finding a path forward in Yemen will require a careful reassessment of US foreign policy objectives, a renewed commitment to diplomatic solutions, and a honest reckoning with the ethical implications of modern warfare. Only through such a comprehensive approach can the US hope to address the complex challenges presented by the Yemen conflict and similar situations around the world.

Article created from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DbD7nmJ5TM