Reverse Engineering Military Tech: From Bradley to B-29

The Art of Military Imitation

In the realm of warfare, there's a time-honored tradition: when your enemy excels at something, you study it, replicate it, and use it against them. This practice of reverse engineering and adapting enemy technology has shaped military advancements for centuries. Today, we'll examine recent examples of this phenomenon, from Russia's assessment of the captured M2 Bradley to historical cases of aircraft replication.

Russia's Bradley Analysis

A leaked Russian report has revealed their evaluation of a captured M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, specifically the Operation Desert Storm Situational Awareness (OESSA) variant built in 2012. This analysis provides fascinating insights into how Russia views American military technology and how it compares to their own BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicle.

Superior Firepower and Accuracy

The report highlights several areas where the Bradley outperforms the BMP-3:

• The Bradley's 25mm M242 Bushmaster chain gun offers twice the accuracy and penetration of the BMP-3's 30mm chain gun.
• This superior accuracy is largely due to the Improved Bradley Acquisition Subsystem (IBAS), which includes:
  • Laser rangefinder
  • Optical and thermal imaging channels
  • Dual target tracking
  • Enhanced situational awareness
• The IBAS extends the effective range of the Bradley's main gun and allows it to engage targets that would be challenging for the BMP-3.
• The ammunition used in the Bradley also demonstrates superior armor penetration capabilities.

BMP-3's Unique Features

Despite the Bradley's advantages, the BMP-3 does have some unique capabilities:

• A low-pressure 100mm 2A70 cannon, which can fire:
  • High-explosive fragmentation shells
  • 9M117 Bastion tube-launched anti-tank guided missiles (capable of penetrating 550mm of armor after defeating explosive reactive armor)
• The ability to fire its main armament while moving
• Two hull-mounted machine guns for additional firepower

Armor and Protection

The Bradley demonstrates superior protection for its occupants:

• A hull made from a mix of aluminum alloys and spaced steel armor
• Frontal armor capable of stopping 30mm ZUBR-8 rounds from the BMP-3
• Enhanced side armor protection
• Bradley Reactive Armor Tiles (BRAT)
  • Explode outward when hit, deflecting blast away from the vehicle
  • Easily replaceable in the field
  • Protect against shaped charges like PG-9VS and PG-7VL rockets

The BMP-3, following Russian design philosophy, prioritizes speed and firepower over protection:

• Smaller and lighter than the Bradley (20.6 tons vs. 33 tons)
• Faster top speed (43 mph vs. 40 mph)
• Fully amphibious, unlike the heavier Bradley

Crew Comfort and Maintenance

The Bradley excels in several practical areas:

• Easier and quicker to maintain, reducing downtime
• More spacious and comfortable for crew and troops
• Connected crew and troop compartments
• Traditional rear door ramp for easier entry/exit

The BMP-3 faces challenges in these areas:

• Separated crew and troop compartments
• Awkward exit process due to rear-mounted engine
• More difficult for troops to dismount, especially under pressure

Historical Precedents: The B-29 and Tu-4

The practice of studying and copying enemy technology is not new. One of the most famous examples is the Soviet Union's replication of the American B-29 Superfortress bomber.

The B-29 Superfortress

The B-29 was a pinnacle of American aviation technology during World War II:

• Longer range and higher payload capacity than any other bomber of its time
• Technologically advanced systems
• Used to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Soviet Acquisition and Replication

Despite the U.S. refusing to share B-29 technology, the Soviet Union acquired several aircraft:

• Four B-29s crash-landed in Soviet territory in 1944
• Three were still airworthy and sent to the Tupolev factory
• Stalin ordered designer Andrei Tupolev to reverse-engineer the B-29 in just two years

Challenges in Replication

The Soviet engineers faced several obstacles:

• Differences in measurement systems (imperial vs. metric)
• Difficulty producing identical aluminum thicknesses
• Pressure to meet tight deadlines

Despite these challenges, the resulting Tu-4 was remarkably similar to the B-29:

• First flight in May 1947
• Publicly displayed at the Moscow Air Show in August 1947
• Became the first aircraft to carry a Soviet nuclear weapon

Modern Copycats: China's Aircraft Development

In recent decades, China has become notorious for its apparent replication of foreign aircraft designs.

Familiar Designs

Several Chinese aircraft bear striking resemblances to American and Russian designs:

• J-10 resembles the F-16
• J-20 shares characteristics with the F-22
• J-31 and J-35 appear similar to the F-35
• J-15 is based on the Russian Su-33

The J-10 and Israeli Connection

The development of China's J-10 fighter involves an interesting twist:

• First domestically-produced Chinese fighter not based on a licensed design
• Believed to have been developed with Israeli assistance
• Based on the Israeli IAI Lavi project, which itself was derived from the F-16
• The Lavi program was cancelled in 1987 due to U.S. export restrictions
• Allegations of Israel selling Lavi technology to China emerged as early as 1988

Industrial Espionage and Stealth Technology

China's rapid advancement in stealth fighter technology has raised suspicions of industrial espionage:

• In 2014, Chinese national Su Bin was arrested for stealing data related to the C-17, F-22, and F-35
• Hackers reportedly accessed F-35 program data in 2009
• Stolen information likely included radar-absorbent materials and stealth technology
• The J-20 fighter subsequently adopted a gray color scheme similar to the F-22 and incorporated an electro-optical tracker resembling that of the F-35

The Ongoing Cycle of Innovation and Imitation

The practice of studying, adapting, and sometimes directly copying enemy technology is a constant in military development. This process has several manifestations:

1. Learning from captured equipment to improve existing designs
2. Incorporating elements of foreign technology into new domestic designs
3. Direct replication of successful foreign designs

This cycle is not limited to any one nation or time period. Even the United States has benefited from foreign technology, particularly in the aftermath of World War II with programs like Operation Paperclip, which brought German scientists and engineers to America.

Conclusion

The study and replication of enemy technology remain crucial aspects of military development. From Russia's analysis of the M2 Bradley to China's apparent copying of American aircraft designs, nations continually seek to learn from and adapt the innovations of their rivals and potential adversaries.

This practice, while sometimes controversial, drives technological progress and ensures that militaries worldwide remain competitive and capable. As long as nations invest in developing cutting-edge military technology, others will inevitably study, reverse-engineer, and adapt these innovations for their own use.

Ultimately, this cycle of innovation and imitation contributes to the ever-evolving nature of warfare and military technology. It underscores the importance of not only developing new technologies but also protecting them from espionage and unauthorized replication. As military technology continues to advance, the race to innovate—and to learn from others' innovations—will remain a central feature of global military competition.

Article created from: https://youtu.be/kdnuh6op_0Y?feature=shared