US Navy's Missile Crisis: Depleting Arsenals and Future Solutions

The US Navy's Unprecedented Missile Usage

The United States Navy has recently found itself in an unexpected predicament. In the past 15 months, naval forces have engaged in more intense combat operations than at any time since World War II. This surge in activity, primarily centered around the Red Sea, has led to an alarming rate of missile expenditure. The Navy has deployed over $1 billion worth of munitions in just over a year, firing more missiles than it did in the previous three decades combined.

This unprecedented use of naval firepower raises critical questions about the sustainability of current missile stockpiles and the Navy's ability to maintain its air defense capabilities in potential future conflicts. Let's delve into the factors contributing to this situation and explore potential solutions.

Operation Prosperity Guardian: A Test of Naval Capabilities

The recent resumption of hostilities in the Red Sea has brought to light a serious issue facing the US Navy. For the first time in decades, naval forces have encountered extended periods of combat at sea, facing 21st-century threats that were previously only theoretical.

Operation Prosperity Guardian, launched to protect commercial shipping in this critical waterway, has seen US Navy ships engaging with a variety of threats, including:

• Anti-ship ballistic missiles
• Cruise missiles
• Swarms of various drone types

These attacks, primarily launched by Houthi rebels in Yemen, have tested the Navy's defensive capabilities to their limits. While US ships and sailors have performed admirably, the sheer volume of incoming fire has revealed an uncomfortable truth: American naval forces are more vulnerable to attrition than previously realized.

The Cost of Modern Naval Defense

The sophisticated air defense systems employed by the US Navy are incredibly effective, but they come at a steep price. The Secretary of the Navy revealed that in the first six months of operations in the Red Sea, the service had expended more than a billion dollars worth of munitions. By October 2024, this figure had risen to $2 billion.

This level of ammunition expenditure is unsustainable given current industrial capacity and procurement methods. Some key statistics highlight the scale of the problem:

• Over 400 separate munitions fired in a 15-month period
• 120 SM2 missiles
• 80 SM6 missiles
• 20 SM3 and enhanced Caesar missiles
• 160 rounds from 5-inch main guns

The cost per unit of these advanced weapons systems is staggering:

• SM6 missile: $4.3 million
• SM3 missile: $12.5 to $28.7 million
• SM2 medium-range missile: over $2 million

In contrast, the drones and other weapons being used against US ships often cost as little as $2,000 to produce.

The Achilles Heel of the US Navy?

The current rate of missile expenditure raises serious concerns about the Navy's ability to sustain operations in a prolonged conflict, especially against a near-peer competitor like China. War games simulating a Chinese invasion of Taiwan have suggested that the United States could run out of long-range missiles within a week of fighting.

Retired Navy Commander Brian Clark highlighted a key issue: "The weapons we've designed are too difficult to build for the industrial base because they're too sophisticated. They have too bespoke a supply chain and they're manufactured by hand at low rate productions."

This combination of high-tech, expensive weapons and limited production capacity creates a perfect storm that could leave US naval forces vulnerable in a prolonged conflict.

Potential Solutions: Going Low-Tech

One obvious solution to the missile shortage is to rely more heavily on "low-tech" options. US Navy destroyers and cruisers still carry large-caliber guns for this very reason. The 127mm MK-45 main gun, while not as advanced as modern missiles, offers several advantages:

• Lower cost per round
• Versatility with different ammunition types
• Ability to engage targets visually in congested waters
• Effective against slower-moving threats and some drones

However, these guns have limitations, particularly in range and effectiveness against fast, maneuverable targets.

Bridging the Gap: Hypervelocity Projectiles

To address the shortcomings of traditional naval guns while still providing a more cost-effective alternative to missiles, the Navy is revisiting the concept of hypervelocity projectiles (HVPs). Originally designed for electromagnetic railguns, these projectiles are being adapted for use in conventional powder guns like the MK-45.

Key features of HVPs include:

• Lightweight, guided, ultra-streamlined design
• Speeds of up to Mach 3 from conventional guns
• Increased range and accuracy compared to standard shells
• Ability to engage a wider range of threats, including some missiles and fast-moving aerial targets

The Navy's MADAP (Major Caliber Anti-Drone Air Program) initiative aims to provide commanders with more options that are more effective than traditional guns yet much more cost-effective than missiles.

Underwater Innovations: The Raptor Program

The US Navy's submarine force is also looking at ways to address ammunition shortages and cost concerns. The Raptor (Rapid Acquisition Procurement Torpedo) program aims to develop a more cost-effective torpedo for use against less sophisticated targets.

Key points of the Raptor program:

• Target cost: No more than $500,000 per torpedo (compared to $4.2 million for a MK48 Mod 7)
• Use of short lead-time components
• Mission-specific, limited-capacity weapon
• Suitable for use on unmanned platforms

This approach would allow submarine commanders to reserve their more expensive and capable MK48 torpedoes for high-priority targets while still maintaining effective offensive capabilities against a range of threats.

The Need for Industrial Base Reform

Beyond developing new weapons systems, addressing the ammunition shortage will require fundamental changes to how the Defense Department procures munitions. Current practices of placing small, short-term orders for munitions disincentivize ammunition companies from increasing their production capacity.

Potential solutions include:

• Signing larger, longer-term contracts with ammunition suppliers
• Anticipating future needs earlier in the procurement process
• Funding procurement over multiple years to provide stability for manufacturers

These changes are particularly urgent given the Chinese military's stated goal of being ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. The US Navy needs to ensure its ammunition stockpiles are sufficient for a potential near-peer conflict within this timeframe.

Future Technologies: Lasers and Electronic Warfare

While addressing immediate ammunition shortages is crucial, the Navy is also investing in technologies that could reduce reliance on traditional munitions in the future. Two key areas of development are:

1. Directed Energy Weapons: The Navy has successfully tested a 60+ kilowatt laser system (HELIOS) against drone targets. These weapons offer the advantage of not requiring traditional ammunition, but they are power-hungry and require significant shipboard electrical capacity.

2. Advanced Electronic Warfare: More sophisticated jamming systems could prove effective against certain types of drones and missiles, potentially reducing the need for kinetic interceptions.

These technologies, while promising, are still in development and will require significant investment in ship design and power generation to be fully effective.

Conclusion: Adapting to a New Era of Naval Warfare

The US Navy finds itself at a critical juncture. The recent experiences in the Red Sea have highlighted vulnerabilities in the current approach to naval air defense and ammunition stockpiles. Addressing these issues will require a multi-faceted approach:

1. Developing more cost-effective weapons like hypervelocity projectiles and the Raptor torpedo
2. Reforming the industrial base to increase production capacity for existing missiles
3. Investing in future technologies like directed energy weapons and advanced electronic warfare
4. Adapting tactics and training to make more efficient use of existing resources

The challenges are significant, but the US Navy has a history of innovation and adaptation. By taking decisive action now, naval planners can ensure that American sailors and airmen will have the tools they need to maintain maritime superiority in the face of evolving threats.

As the nature of naval warfare continues to change, one thing remains constant: the need for flexibility, innovation, and foresight in maintaining America's naval edge. The coming years will be crucial in determining whether the US Navy can successfully navigate these challenges and emerge stronger and more capable than ever.

The Global Implications of Naval Ammunition Shortages

The issues facing the US Navy have broader implications for global maritime security and the balance of power in key regions. As the primary guarantor of freedom of navigation in many of the world's most critical waterways, any reduction in the US Navy's capabilities could have far-reaching consequences.

Impact on Allied Nations

Many of America's allies rely on US naval power for their security. Countries like Japan, South Korea, and various NATO members often integrate their naval forces with US carrier strike groups and other assets. A shortage of missiles and other munitions could limit the effectiveness of these combined operations, potentially emboldening adversaries.

Allied nations may need to increase their own naval spending and capabilities to compensate for any perceived weaknesses in US naval power. This could lead to a broader arms race, particularly in regions like the Indo-Pacific where tensions are already high.

Shifts in Regional Power Dynamics

If the US Navy's ability to project power and sustain operations is seen as diminished, it could alter the strategic calculus in several key regions:

• South China Sea: China might become more assertive in its territorial claims
• Persian Gulf: Iran could feel emboldened to challenge freedom of navigation
• Mediterranean: Russian naval activity could increase
• Arctic: Competition for resources and shipping routes could intensify

Economic Implications

The global economy relies heavily on secure sea lanes for trade. Any perception that these lanes are less secure due to naval ammunition shortages could have significant economic impacts:

• Increased shipping insurance costs
• Rerouting of vessels to avoid high-risk areas
• Potential disruptions to global supply chains
• Higher consumer prices for goods transported by sea

The Role of Diplomacy and International Cooperation

Given the challenges facing the US Navy and the potential global implications, diplomatic efforts and international cooperation will be crucial in maintaining maritime security. Some potential avenues for action include:

1. Strengthening existing alliances and forming new partnerships to share the burden of naval operations
2. Engaging in arms control negotiations to limit the proliferation of advanced anti-ship weapons
3. Working through international bodies like the UN to address root causes of maritime conflicts
4. Developing multinational rapid response forces to address threats to commercial shipping

The Need for Public Awareness and Support

Addressing the Navy's ammunition shortage and modernizing naval capabilities will require significant investment and political will. Educating the public about the importance of naval power and the current challenges facing the fleet will be crucial in garnering support for necessary funding and reforms.

Key points to emphasize could include:

• The role of naval power in protecting global trade
• The evolving nature of maritime threats
• The long-term economic benefits of maintaining naval superiority
• The potential costs of failing to address current shortcomings

Looking to the Future: Balancing Traditional and Emerging Capabilities

As the US Navy works to address its current ammunition shortages and modernize its fleet, it must strike a balance between maintaining traditional capabilities and investing in emerging technologies. This balanced approach should consider:

1. Maintaining a mix of high-end and more cost-effective weapons systems
2. Investing in unmanned and autonomous systems to complement crewed vessels
3. Developing new concepts of operation that maximize the effectiveness of available resources
4. Fostering a culture of innovation within the Navy to quickly adapt to new threats

By addressing the immediate challenges while also preparing for the future, the US Navy can ensure it remains the preeminent naval force in the world, capable of protecting American interests and maintaining global maritime security for decades to come.

The path forward will not be easy, but with strategic investment, innovative thinking, and sustained commitment, the US Navy can overcome its current ammunition challenges and emerge stronger and more capable than ever before.

Article created from: https://youtu.be/D5DuxMnlYu4?feature=shared