1. YouTube Summaries
  2. The Art of Failing to Cancel Hololive: A Look at Content Creator Misfires

The Art of Failing to Cancel Hololive: A Look at Content Creator Misfires

By scribe 3 minute read

Create articles from any YouTube video or use our API to get YouTube transcriptions

Start for free
or, create a free article to see how easy it is.

In the ever-evolving world of content creation and virtual entertainment, Hololive, a prominent virtual YouTuber agency, often finds itself at the center of controversy and attempted cancellations. Yet, not all efforts to disparage or discredit its talents succeed. In fact, many such attempts end up highlighting the resilience and professionalism of Hololive members, as well as the unwavering support of their fanbase. This article delves into several instances where content creators aimed to cancel Hololive members, only to see their efforts backfire spectacularly.

Content Creators vs. Hololive: Attempts at Cancellation

Nissa Ravencroft's Call for Creativity

Nissa Ravencroft, a member of Hololive English Advent, recently encouraged English lyricists, both cover artists and original creators, to share their work with her. This open invitation, similar to those made by other Hololive members, aimed to spotlight smaller artists and potentially offer collaboration opportunities. Such threads garner significant attention and serve as a valuable platform for artists to showcase their talents.

The Misguided Reply

Among the numerous responses to Ravencroft's call was a reply from a music producer named Joshua, who shared a commission opportunity. This seemingly benign interaction drew attention due to Joshua's previous attempt to cancel Hololive members, the Fuam Moko twins, over a similar initiative. Joshua criticized the twins for seeking free art and music from fans, advocating for direct payment to creators instead. This stance sparked debate over the value of exposure versus direct compensation in creative collaborations.

The Fuam Moko Twins Incident

Approximately six months prior, the Fuam Moko twins had launched an art competition, seeking a jingle for their streams. Joshua's public criticism of this event highlighted a broader discussion about the ethics of soliciting free contributions from fans. Despite his critique, many in the community argued that the exposure and potential collaboration opportunities offered by such competitions could significantly benefit aspiring artists.

The Fallout and Professionalism of Hololive Members

Joshua's previous collaboration with another Hololive member, Mory Kip, came to light, adding layers to the controversy. After his attempt to cancel the Fuam Moko twins, Mory Kip subtly distanced herself from Joshua, replacing the music he had produced for her stream's transformation animation. This move demonstrated Hololive's tendency to address controversies quietly and professionally, without engaging in public disputes.

Suay and the Idol Master Collaboration

Another Hololive member, Suay, recently participated in a collaboration with the Idol Master Cinderella Girls Starlight Stage game. A Japanese Pokémon YouTuber criticized the collaboration and Suay, leading to backlash and highlighting the risks of defamation in Japan. Hololive's parent company, Cover Corp, has a history of taking legal action against defamation, emphasizing the importance of thoughtful commentary in the digital age.

Key Takeaways

  • Hololive's Supportive Community: These incidents underscore the strength and solidarity of Hololive's fanbase. Supporters rally around talents facing criticism, showcasing the positive aspects of online communities.

  • Professional Handling of Controversies: Hololive members and their management demonstrate a consistent approach to controversies, prioritizing professionalism and subtle resolution over public feuds.

  • The Value of Exposure: The debate over exposure versus direct compensation in creative collaborations remains a contentious issue. However, Hololive's initiatives offer valuable opportunities for artists to gain visibility and potentially collaborate with popular virtual talents.

  • Legal Ramifications in Japan: The incidents highlight the serious legal consequences of defamation in Japan, reminding content creators to navigate criticisms carefully.

In conclusion, while attempts to cancel Hololive members occasionally emerge, the agency's talents continue to thrive, supported by a dedicated fanbase and a management team skilled in navigating online controversies. These incidents not only highlight the challenges faced by virtual entertainers but also the resilience and community spirit that define Hololive.

For more insights into these controversies and Hololive's responses, watch the full video here.

Ready to automate your
LinkedIn, Twitter and blog posts with AI?

Start for free