The Stock Market Auction: Why the Voting Machine Metaphor is Misleading

The Misleading Voting Machine Metaphor

Warren Buffett often quotes his mentor Benjamin Graham as saying that the stock market is like a voting machine in the short term but a weighing machine in the long term. This metaphor has profoundly influenced how many people think about price formation in the stock market. However, this analogy is extremely misleading and causes people to think about stock market price formation in exactly the wrong way.

How Stock Market Prices Are Really Formed

The stock market is not a mechanism for tallying up the opinions of all participants about the value of a particular stock. Market prices do not reflect an average or weighted average of market opinions.

Instead, the stock market is divided into two groups:

1. Owners of shares who believe the stock price is too low
2. Non-owners who believe the stock price is too high

Crucially, for any given stock, less than 1% of market participants actually own shares. The vast majority (99%+) believe the stock is overvalued at the current price.

The Auction Principle

The stock market functions as an auction where shares are awarded to the highest bidders. Only the opinions of the most optimistic participants (current owners and potential buyers) actually determine the stock price. The views of the other 99% have no impact.

This means:

• Prices reflect the opinions of the most optimistic < 1%, not the average view
• Only changes in the opinions of this small group will move prices
• To forecast prices, focus on what the most optimistic investors will think, not the average

Implications of the Auction Model

Understanding that prices are set by the most optimistic minority has several important implications:

Explaining Bubbles

Bubbles can form when a small group of extremely optimistic investors drive prices far above what most consider reasonable. The majority opinion is irrelevant.

Market Crashes

Crashes can occur when macro events cause even optimistic investors to sell, with no buyers at previous price levels. This forces rapid price declines to find new buyers.

Fundamental Analysis

When analyzing stocks, focus on scenarios that could change the views of the most optimistic investors. Average or consensus opinions don't matter for price formation.

The Weighing Machine Fallacy

The idea that the market becomes a "weighing machine" in the long run is also flawed:

• There's no standard, objective measure of a stock's value
• Different investors use different criteria and time horizons
• The most optimistic views still determine long-term prices
• Being optimistic doesn't make an investor more likely to be correct

Practical Takeaways for Investors

1. Ignore the majority opinion on a stock - it's irrelevant for price formation
2. Focus on understanding the views of the most optimistic investors and potential buyers
3. For fundamental analysis, consider what could change the opinions of this optimistic minority
4. Pay attention to the most bullish analysts and investors to calibrate your expectations
5. Remember that macro events can impact a broader set of investors, potentially moving the entire market

Conclusion

The "voting machine" metaphor for the stock market is deeply misleading. Prices are determined by auctions, not averages or consensus. Only the views of the most optimistic minority matter. Understanding this principle is crucial for developing an accurate mental model of how markets really work.

Investors should recalibrate their thinking away from majority opinions and focus on what could change the minds of the most bullish participants. This paradigm shift in understanding market dynamics can lead to more effective analysis and decision-making in stock investing.

Article created from: https://youtu.be/K--QOyJX8a0