Russia's Military Evolution: Adapting and Strengthening Despite Massive Losses in Ukraine

Russia's Staggering Losses in Ukraine

The scale of Russia's losses in its war against Ukraine is truly staggering. According to the UK Ministry of Defense, by November 2024 Russia had suffered over 700,000 casualties - killed or wounded - since invading Ukraine in February 2022. To put that number in perspective, it exceeds the entire population of Boston.

The casualty rate accelerated dramatically in 2024, with daily losses reaching up to 500 men killed or wounded for tiny stretches of territory. In November 2024 alone, Russia was losing the equivalent of an entire battalion every single day. Ukraine's Ministry of Defense claims Russia lost 430,790 soldiers in 2024. Even if we assume this figure is somewhat inflated, we're still talking about losses that would cripple most conventional armies.

The hardware losses are equally mind-boggling. Oryx, an open-source tracking group, has visually confirmed the destruction of:

• Nearly 3,800 tanks
• 5,600 infantry fighting vehicles
• 1,900 armored vehicles
• 28 warships

To put this in context, Russia has lost more tanks than most NATO countries possess in their entire inventories.

With losses on this scale, one might expect Russia to have tapped out by now. No military could sustain this kind of punishment and remain combat effective - or so conventional wisdom would suggest. But that hasn't happened. Instead, Russia has found ways to not just endure these catastrophic losses, but to actually grow stronger in certain key areas.

How Russia is Sustaining the War Effort

Russia isn't following the Western playbook when it comes to absorbing and responding to massive military losses. Instead of folding under the pressure, they've implemented a multi-pronged strategy to keep their war machine running:

1. Brute Force Mobilization

In 2022, Russia mobilized 300,000 conscripts in one massive push. But they didn't stop there. Their ongoing "Time of Heroes" recruitment campaign continues to funnel warm bodies to the front lines. Unlike Western armies that rely on all-volunteer forces and face recruitment challenges due to high standards and competition from the private sector, Russia can manifest countless troops through less discriminating means:

• Drafting citizens
• Conscripting prisoners
• Pressing ethnic minorities from remote regions into service

This "any warm body will do" approach creates a lower quality force compared to professional volunteer militaries. However, it gives Russia something Western planners didn't expect: the ability to endure and withstand a war of attrition.

According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Russia's military is almost completely reconstituted to pre-war levels. After three years of the bloodiest conventional warfare since World War II, Russia has managed to rebuild its military to roughly the same size as before the invasion.

2. Industrial Adaptation and Ramped-Up Production

Russia's defense industry has shifted into overdrive, revealing capabilities that Western analysts had underestimated. They've ramped up production in several key areas:

• Drones: Russia has significantly increased drone production to try to close the gap with Western capabilities. While exact numbers are difficult to verify (especially since Russia includes Iranian drones in their figures), the increase is substantial.

• Artillery Shells: As of 2024, Russia's shell production was estimated at around 3 million per year. Soviet-era factories designed for mass production are getting a facelift and being retooled to meet wartime demands.

• Improvised Solutions: Russia has developed cheaper alternatives to high-tech systems. For example, they're mass-producing UMPK glide bomb kits that transform unguided bombs into precision-guided munitions - a poor man's smart bomb that's proving devastatingly effective against Ukrainian positions.

3. International Support

Russia isn't fighting this war alone. They've created what some analysts call an "autocrat supply chain" with China, Iran, and North Korea providing crucial support:

• Iran shipped hundreds of FAT-360 missiles to Russia in late 2024, on top of previous deliveries.
• China is providing dual-use components that help Russia bypass Western sanctions.
• North Korea has reportedly supplied artillery shells and other munitions.

This "axis of convenience" is united primarily by their opposition to Western interests rather than any deep ideological bonds.

4. Economic Resilience

Despite Western sanctions, Russia's economy has weathered the storm far better than analysts predicted. Key factors include:

• Transformation of the economy, with the military-industrial complex becoming the most dynamic sector.
• Shift in government spending towards defense production, creating a militarized economic model reminiscent of the Soviet era.
• Continued energy exports through a fleet of "shadow tankers," allowing Russia to remain the world's third-largest oil producer at 10.4 million barrels daily.
• Redirection of exports, with China becoming Russia's primary trading partner and a crucial source for sanctioned goods.
• Replacement of the dollar and euro with the Chinese yuan as Russia's primary currency for international transactions and savings.

While sanctions have certainly damaged Russia's economy - inflation has spiked, interest rates hover around 21%, and ordinary Russians are feeling the pinch with skyrocketing prices for basic goods - they haven't crippled it. Moscow has found workarounds in alternative markets and leveraged authoritarianism to maintain the economic foundation necessary for waging prolonged warfare.

Battlefield Adaptations and Innovations

Russia's battlefield failures have paradoxically forced them to innovate in ways that make them more dangerous, not less. When faced with the destruction of expensive equipment like $42 million SU-34 fighter-bombers or $330 million A-50U AWACS planes, Russia chose to adapt rather than give up.

Some key innovations include:

Drone Warfare

Russia has developed and deployed new drone models like the Lancet and Orlan to compensate for their shortage of high-tech reconnaissance platforms. These drones, recently developed by the Zala Aero Group (a subsidiary of the Kalashnikov arms conglomerate), are cheap, numerous, and swarm-like in their deployment. While they may not match the capabilities of Western drones like Predators or Reapers, their quantity allows them to saturate enemy defenses effectively.

Tactical Changes

Russia has made significant changes to its tactics based on hard-learned lessons:

• Moving away from massive tank columns that were easily ambushed in the early days of the war towards more dispersed units.
• Improving electronic warfare capabilities, drone countermeasures, and artillery coordination.
• Adapting air defenses to counter NATO-supplied weapons.
• Innovating logistics solutions, including the use of pack animals (dubbed "war mules") to overcome challenging terrain and supply line disruptions.

Doctrinal Evolution

Through this brutal, real-time military education, Russia is paying for lessons in blood and treasure. However, they're definitely learning, and that lessons-learned process is making its way back to Russian military academies, training programs, and doctrine development. The officers who survive this conflict will form the backbone of a military that's been battle-tested in a way no NATO force has been in decades.

Beyond Conventional Warfare

Russia's strategy extends far beyond the conventional battlefield. While Ukrainian forces face the brunt of Russia's artillery and infantry, the West faces a different kind of offensive - one happening in the murky area between peace and war.

Nuclear Posturing

Russia has repeatedly issued nuclear threats since 2022, each one strategically timed to coincide with Western deliberations about sending new weapons or aid to Ukraine. This nuclear flexing has had a measurable impact, with Western leaders often citing fears of escalation or nuclear confrontation when debating aid packages. These hesitations create windows of opportunity for Russia to regroup and reinforce.

Exploiting Political Divisions

Russia has expertly exploited divisions within the EU and NATO. For example, Hungary's Viktor Orban blocked 50 billion euros in EU aid to Ukraine in 2024, allegedly favoring the Kremlin's interests. Russia doesn't need to defeat NATO militarily if it can paralyze it politically and fracture its unity.

Information Warfare

Russia continues to wage an aggressive campaign of disinformation and propaganda, both domestically and internationally. By controlling the media narrative within Russia and sowing doubt and division in Western democracies, the Kremlin aims to maintain domestic support for the war while eroding Western resolve to support Ukraine.

The Long Game: Autocracy vs. Democracy

Here's an uncomfortable truth that military analysts are increasingly concerned about: Russia's autocratic system is uniquely suited for prolonged conflict. The Kremlin controls the media, suppresses dissent, and can direct economic resources toward the war effort without worrying about election cycles, budget oversight, or public opinion.

In democracies, leaders need to justify casualties and expenses to voters. In Russia, the government simply declares losses as state secrets and arrests anyone who questions the official narrative. Russian families often don't get detailed casualty notifications; many just receive a message saying their son is "missing" or has "left service."

It's a classic tortoise and hare scenario, except this tortoise has nuclear weapons and seems perfectly willing to sacrifice countless lives to win the race. Western democracies sprint with initial enthusiasm, but their attention spans and tolerance for sustained hardship have limits that autocracies don't face.

Russia has studied Western behavior patterns from Afghanistan to Iraq to Libya. They understand that Western support typically follows a predictable arc: initial moral outrage and strong support, followed by gradual weariness, budget concerns, and eventually disengagement. Therefore, Putin doesn't need to win quickly; he just needs to outlast Western patience.

A More Dangerous Russia?

While Russia is indeed bruised and battered, having paid an enormous price for Putin's imperial ambitions, they may be far from beaten. In some ways, they're potentially more dangerous now than before the war began:

1. They've adapted their tactics and increased production capabilities.
2. They've strengthened relationships with allies like China, Iran, and North Korea.
3. They've maintained domestic control despite catastrophic losses.
4. Their military has been bloodied in combat and learned valuable, if painful, lessons that will inform their doctrine for decades.

When this war eventually ends - whether through negotiation, exhaustion, or some other path - NATO will likely face a Russia that's battle-hardened, numerically reconstituted, and carrying a massive grudge. The question isn't whether Russia will remain a threat, but what kind of threat they'll become.

This should change the way Western planners think about the post-Ukraine security landscape. Russia may not emerge from this conflict as a spent force ready to rejoin the community of nations as a responsible actor. Instead, we may be witnessing what future historians might call "pulling a Putin" - where an aggressor who almost lost it all emerges as a more capable, more paranoid, and more hostile power, one that's proven willing to accept staggering casualties to achieve its objectives.

Conclusion: Preparing for a Post-War Russia

At the onset of the war, particularly during the first two years, the West appeared to be operating on the assumption that Russia was being ground down into irrelevance. However, the evidence suggests that might not be the case. Russia may not be collapsing; instead, it may be adapting, evolving, and reloading for the next round.

The West must carefully consider whether it's preparing adequately for a post-Ukraine war Russia. Are we at risk of making the same mistake we made after the Cold War, believing that Russia would become a "normal" country playing by "normal" rules?

As we move forward, it's crucial that Western policymakers and military planners:

1. Reassess their assumptions about Russia's capabilities and resilience.
2. Develop strategies to counter Russia's adaptations and innovations.
3. Strengthen NATO unity and resolve in the face of ongoing Russian attempts to divide the alliance.
4. Prepare for a potentially more dangerous and unpredictable Russia in the years to come.
5. Maintain support for Ukraine while also planning for long-term deterrence and containment strategies.

The lessons of this conflict will shape geopolitics and military strategy for decades to come. It's imperative that the West learns these lessons as thoroughly as Russia seems to be doing. The security of Europe and the broader international order may depend on it.

Article created from: https://youtu.be/lX758dc52K8?feature=shared