Russian Turtle Tanks: Innovative Armor or Desperate Measure?

The Rise of the Russian 'Turtle Tank'

In the ever-evolving landscape of modern warfare, a peculiar sight has emerged on the battlefields of Ukraine - the Russian 'turtle tank'. These modified armored vehicles, first observed in April 2024, have sparked curiosity, ridicule, and serious analysis in equal measure. But what exactly are these strange-looking tanks, and what do they reveal about the current state of military technology and tactics?

What is a 'Turtle Tank'?

The so-called 'turtle tank' is a heavily modified version of older Russian tank models, primarily T-72s and T-62s. The most striking feature of these vehicles is the large, boxy structure welded onto the top of the tank, giving it a distinctive appearance that has drawn comparisons to everything from the Jawa sandcrawler in Star Wars to a mobile shed.

These modifications serve several purposes:

1. Protection against aerial threats, particularly small FPV (First Person View) drones
2. Transport of infantry
3. Electronic warfare capabilities

The Context: A Gap in Short-Range Air Defense

To understand the emergence of turtle tanks, we need to look at the broader context of modern warfare. One of the key issues highlighted by the conflict in Ukraine is a significant capability gap in short-range air defense (SHORAD) vehicles.

Traditionally, armored vehicles assaulting an objective would be protected from aerial threats by dedicated air defense vehicles. For the Russians, this role would typically be filled by the 2K22 Tunguska, while the Americans rely on systems like the Avenger. However, recent combat footage from both sides has shown a conspicuous absence of these vehicles during assaults.

The reason for this absence becomes clear when we consider the nature of the aerial threat in modern warfare. While traditional SHORAD systems are effective against aircraft, they struggle to engage the fast-moving, low-flying FPV drones that have become ubiquitous on the modern battlefield. These small, agile drones present a significant threat to armored vehicles but are extremely difficult for conventional air defense systems to track and engage.

Design and Capabilities of the Turtle Tank

Physical Characteristics

The turtle tank's most obvious feature is its distinctive outer shell. This consists of:

• A large, boxy structure on top of the tank, made from welded metal sheets
• Additional metal caging and panels along the sides of the vehicle
• In some cases, chains hanging at the front of the vehicle

This additional structure adds significant weight to the vehicle - estimates suggest between 5,000 to 10,000 pounds of extra metal. However, this weight increase is partially offset by the removal of ammunition and explosive reactive armor from the base tank.

Armament and Mobility

The modifications to create a turtle tank often come at the cost of the vehicle's original capabilities:

• Many turtle tanks have their main gun (typically a 125mm cannon) completely disabled
• The turret is often locked in place, severely limiting the tank's ability to engage targets
• Visibility for the crew is significantly reduced
• The additional weight and structure impact the vehicle's speed and maneuverability

Despite these limitations, some turtle tanks retain limited firing capability, with the main gun able to traverse about 30 degrees to the front.

Electronic Warfare Capabilities

One of the most significant aspects of the turtle tank is its electronic warfare suite. The captured example revealed that these vehicles are equipped with jammers designed to disrupt the control signals of enemy drones.

These jammers are typically:

• Omnidirectional, providing 360-degree coverage
• Capable of jamming multiple frequencies
• Mounted on the roof of the added structure

The effectiveness of these jammers varies, but reports from Ukrainian forces suggest that they have had some success in disrupting drone operations.

Tactical Use of Turtle Tanks

The primary role of turtle tanks appears to be as a breaching and clearing vehicle. They are typically deployed at the front of an armored column, acting as a modern-day battering ram. This use aligns with historical siege tactics, with the turtle tank serving a similar role to medieval siege towers.

Key tactical considerations include:

1. Drone Magnet: By placing the turtle tank at the front of a formation, it absorbs drone attacks that might otherwise target more valuable vehicles.

2. Infantry Transport: The added structure on top of the tank can accommodate a squad of up to 10 soldiers, allowing for protected transport to the front lines.

3. Mine Clearing: Many turtle tanks are equipped with mine-clearing plows or rollers, further emphasizing their role in breaching enemy defenses.

4. Electronic Warfare Platform: The jamming capabilities of the turtle tank provide a mobile electronic warfare asset that can disrupt enemy drone operations during an assault.

Effectiveness and Limitations

The effectiveness of turtle tanks in combat has been mixed. While they have shown some ability to withstand multiple drone strikes and continue functioning, numerous examples have also been abandoned or destroyed.

Advantages:

• Improved survivability against FPV drone attacks
• Ability to transport infantry under protection
• Electronic warfare capabilities

Limitations:

• Reduced mobility and speed
• Limited offensive capabilities
• Vulnerability of troops in the top structure to artillery and small arms fire

Implications for Modern Warfare

The emergence of turtle tanks highlights several important trends and challenges in modern warfare:

1. Drone Threat: The prevalence of low-cost, easy-to-use FPV drones has created a significant threat to armored vehicles that existing air defense systems struggle to counter.

2. Adaptation and Improvisation: The turtle tank demonstrates the ongoing need for militaries to adapt quickly to new threats, even if the solutions are not elegant or ideal.

3. Electronic Warfare: The inclusion of jamming equipment on these vehicles underscores the growing importance of electronic warfare in modern conflicts.

4. Cost-Benefit Analysis: The turtle tank represents a trade-off between protection and capability, raising questions about the optimal balance in vehicle design.

5. Future of Armored Warfare: The challenges posed by drones and the limitations of current SHORAD systems may drive significant changes in armored vehicle design and tactics in the coming years.

The Future of Turtle Tanks and Counter-Drone Systems

While the turtle tank represents an interesting stopgap measure, it's unlikely to be a long-term solution to the drone threat. Future developments are likely to focus on more sophisticated counter-drone systems that can be integrated into existing armored vehicles without compromising their core capabilities.

Potential future developments include:

• Improved SHORAD systems capable of engaging small, fast-moving drones
• Integration of counter-drone capabilities into existing armored fighting vehicles
• Development of new, purpose-built vehicles that combine traditional armored warfare capabilities with robust counter-drone systems

Conclusion

The Russian turtle tank, whether you view it as an innovative adaptation or a desperate measure, provides valuable insights into the challenges facing modern militaries. It highlights the ongoing struggle to counter the threat posed by low-cost drones and the limitations of existing air defense systems.

While the turtle tank may not represent the future of armored warfare, it serves as a stark reminder of the need for continued innovation and adaptation in military technology and tactics. As warfare continues to evolve, the ability to quickly develop and field new solutions to emerging threats will be crucial for success on the battlefield.

Ultimately, the story of the turtle tank is one of necessity driving innovation. It demonstrates that in the face of new challenges, even seemingly crude or unusual solutions can have a place on the modern battlefield. As military planners and engineers work to develop more refined counter-drone systems, the lessons learned from the turtle tank experiment will likely inform future designs and tactics.

The emergence of these modified vehicles has sparked a renewed focus on the development of effective counter-drone systems, not just in Russia but around the world. It's a testament to the ongoing arms race between offensive and defensive technologies, and a reminder that the nature of warfare is constantly changing.

As we look to the future, it's clear that the challenge of protecting armored vehicles from aerial threats will continue to be a critical area of focus. Whether the solution comes in the form of advanced electronic warfare systems, new kinetic interceptors, or novel armor designs remains to be seen. What is certain is that the humble turtle tank, for all its limitations, has played a role in shaping this conversation and driving innovation in modern warfare.

Article created from: https://youtu.be/h_LwTgkLCSM?feature=shared