Qwen 3 AI Model: A Comprehensive Review of Its Coding Capabilities

Introduction to Qwen 3

The AI landscape is constantly evolving, with new models emerging and claiming superior performance. One such model is Qwen 3, specifically the Qwen 3 235B A22B variant, which has recently garnered attention for its purported capabilities in coding tasks. This article provides a comprehensive review of Qwen 3's performance across various coding challenges, comparing it to other leading AI models like Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro, OpenAI's GPT-4, and Anthropic's Claude 3.7.

Testing Methodology

To evaluate Qwen 3's capabilities, a series of coding tasks were designed, ranging from simple game simulations to complex machine learning implementations. These tasks were presented to Qwen 3 and other AI models for comparison. The assessment criteria included:

• Code correctness and functionality
• Efficiency of solutions
• Ability to handle complex instructions
• Troubleshooting and error correction
• Implementation of advanced concepts (e.g., reinforcement learning)

Task 1: 2D Solar System Simulation

The Challenge

The first task involved creating a 2D simulation of our solar system with an interactive probe launch feature. The requirements included:

• A self-contained HTML file
• User ability to launch a probe by clicking and dragging near planets
• UI controls for play, pause, reset, and simulation speed

Qwen 3's Performance

Qwen 3 demonstrated impressive capabilities in tackling this task:

• Generated a functional HTML file with the required features
• Implemented accurate planetary motion and gravitational effects
• Created an interactive probe launch mechanism
• Provided UI controls as specified

However, there were some areas for improvement:

• Initial simulation speed was too slow, requiring adjustment
• Gravitational effects were initially limited to the sun, needing modification to include planetary gravity

Comparison with Other Models

While Qwen 3 performed well, it didn't significantly outperform other leading models like Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-4 in this task. All models were able to generate functional simulations with minor differences in implementation details.

Task 2: Soccer Simulation Game

The Challenge

The second task involved creating a 2v2 soccer simulation game with the following features:

• Characters with stats, levels, and experience
• Gameplay mechanics including tackling and scoring
• Experience gain and character improvement over time

Qwen 3's Performance

Qwen 3 struggled with this task:

• Initial attempts resulted in non-functional code
• Players did not interact properly with the ball or each other
• Multiple revisions were required, but core gameplay issues persisted

Comparison with Other Models

In this task, Qwen 3 was outperformed by both Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4:

• Gemini 2.5 Pro produced a fully functional game with advanced features like player stats and experience points
• GPT-4 also generated a working game with proper ball interaction and scoring mechanics

This task highlighted some limitations in Qwen 3's ability to handle complex game logic and character interactions.

Task 3: Autonomous Snake Game with Reinforcement Learning

The Challenge

This advanced task required creating a snake game with two AI-controlled snakes, implementing a reinforcement learning training pipeline, and providing different execution modes:

• Play mode with scripted movement
• Training mode using PyTorch for reinforcement learning
• Modes to use trained neural networks for snake behavior

Qwen 3's Performance

Qwen 3 showed creativity in its approach to this task:

• Implemented a text-based version of the snake game
• Created a functional reinforcement learning pipeline
• Provided different execution modes as requested

However, there were some deviations from the expected output:

• The game was text-based rather than graphical
• The training process was initiated in play mode, contrary to instructions

Comparison with Other Models

While Qwen 3's solution was innovative, it didn't fully meet the task requirements. Other models like Gemini 2.5 Pro were able to produce more complete solutions with graphical interfaces and clearer separation between play and training modes.

Task 4: Hand Gesture Music Player

The Challenge

This task involved creating a Python program that uses the user's webcam to play music based on hand gestures.

Qwen 3's Performance

Qwen 3 performed well on this task:

• Successfully implemented webcam integration
• Created a basic system for playing music based on hand gestures
• Produced a functional program in a single attempt

Comparison with Other Models

While Qwen 3's solution was satisfactory, it was noted that other models had produced more advanced implementations with a wider range of gestures and musical options. Qwen 3's performance was rated as good but not exceptional in this case.

Task 5: Interactive Audio Book with AI-Generated Content and Voice

The Challenge

This complex task involved creating an interactive audio book using OpenAI for story generation and Eleven Labs for voice synthesis. Requirements included:

• Using provided API keys for OpenAI and Eleven Labs
• Creating an HTML-based interface
• Implementing microphone interaction for user input

Qwen 3's Performance

Qwen 3 struggled with this task:

• Failed to properly implement the Eleven Labs voice synthesis
• Lacked the required microphone interaction for user input
• Produced a partially functional solution that didn't meet all requirements

Comparison with Other Models

In this task, Qwen 3 was significantly outperformed by other models:

• Gemini 2.5 Pro produced a fully functional solution with proper API integration and user interaction
• Claude 3.7 created an impressive implementation with additional features and a polished user interface
• GPT-4 also generated a working solution that met all requirements

This task highlighted some limitations in Qwen 3's ability to integrate multiple APIs and create complex interactive systems.

Overall Assessment of Qwen 3

Based on the performance across these diverse coding tasks, we can draw several conclusions about the Qwen 3 model:

Strengths

• Capable of handling a wide range of coding tasks
• Performs well on tasks involving basic game simulations and physics
• Shows creativity in approaching complex problems (e.g., text-based snake game)
• Can implement machine learning concepts like reinforcement learning

Limitations

• Struggles with more complex game logic and character interactions
• Sometimes deviates from specific task requirements
• Has difficulty with tasks requiring integration of multiple external APIs
• May not always produce the most efficient or elegant solutions

Comparison to Other Models

While Qwen 3 demonstrates impressive capabilities, it does not consistently outperform leading models like Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-4, or Claude 3.7 in coding tasks. In several instances, these other models produced more complete, efficient, or feature-rich solutions.

Conclusion

Qwen 3 is undoubtedly a powerful AI model with significant coding capabilities. It performs well across a range of tasks and shows particular strength in areas like physics simulations and basic game development. However, claims of its superiority over models like Gemini 2.5 Pro in coding benchmarks may be overstated based on the results of these tests.

While Qwen 3 is likely to be one of the strongest open-source models available, it currently does not appear to surpass the capabilities of leading proprietary models from companies like Google DeepMind, Anthropic, and OpenAI in the realm of coding tasks.

As with all AI models, Qwen 3's performance may vary depending on specific use cases and implementations. Further testing and real-world application will provide a more comprehensive understanding of its strengths and limitations relative to other leading AI models.

Ultimately, Qwen 3 represents another significant step forward in AI coding capabilities, but it exists within a highly competitive landscape where multiple models are pushing the boundaries of what's possible in AI-assisted programming.

Article created from: https://youtu.be/TvmGKc_T-aI?feature=shared