Decoding Desire and Subjectivity in Psychoanalysis

Understanding Desire in Psychoanalytic Theory

The concept of desire is pivotal in psychoanalytic theory, particularly in the works of Jacques Lacan. His interpretation of desire is heavily influenced by Hegel as interpreted by Alexandre Kojève. Hegel distinguishes between natural desires, such as hunger or thirst, which aim to negate and consume the other, and human desires which seek recognition and value from others.

Hegel's Influence on Lacan

Hegel’s philosophy introduces the idea that human desire is not just about fulfilling needs but involves a negation of self — a desire to be valued by others. This form of desire is crucial for developing a sense of subjectivity where one sees oneself as a valuable, recognized individual. This reciprocal recognition is what Hegel sees as foundational for self-consciousness.

Lacan’s Development on Desire

Lacan builds on these ideas but introduces a critical twist — he argues that human desire goes beyond the simple mechanics of need and demand. According to Lacan, once language enters the equation, our needs become alienated. They are expressed through universal signifiers that can never fully capture individual desires because they must be communicated to others who interpret these signifiers.

The Role of Language in Shaping Desire

Language plays a central role in transforming direct needs (natural desires) to demands (human desires). For instance, when a child cries without language, the need is pure and unmediated. As soon as language comes in, those cries turn to demands — not just for specific items but for love and recognition.

The Transition from Need to Demand

As children learn to articulate their needs through language, they also begin making demands for love — essentially confirming their existence and value through the responses they receive from parental figures. However, no matter how much these demands are met, there remains an unfulfilled aspect — what Lacan refers to as 'desire beyond demand.' This represents an insatiable longing for something lost or unattainable — an object that cannot be fully articulated because it transcends spoken language.

Deleuze and Guattari's Critique on Lack and Desire

While acknowledging the existence of lack and desire described by Lacan, Deleuze and Guattari argue against viewing them as inherent or primordial aspects of human psychology. They suggest that such lacks are not natural but are constructed — particularly within capitalist societies which manipulate desires through market mechanisms.

Capitalism's Role in Structuring Desire

Deleuze and Guattari point out how capitalism creates artificial scarcities and manipulates desires through controlling supply and demand. They argue that this manipulation leads individuals to constantly feel precarious or lacking — driving continuous consumption under the illusion that it might fulfill their unmet desires.

Beyond Oedipal Constraints

They further critique traditional psychoanalytic frameworks like the Oedipus complex which posits an inherent guilt within familial structures dictated by capitalist ideologies. Instead, they propose viewing societal structures outside these familial metaphors to understand broader social dynamics influencing subject formation.

Conclusion

The journey through understanding desire in psychoanalytic theory reveals complex layers where individual psychology intersects with philosophical theories and societal structures. From Hegel’s philosophical notions about recognition shaping our deepest desires to Lacan’s intricate layers where language reshapes our primal needs towards unmet demands; further expanded by Deleuze and Guattari’s critique on how societal structures manipulate these very lacks — each layer adds depth to our understanding of human subjectivity.

Article created from: https://youtu.be/Fzek38M2iPI?si=NQoHjsXHzwZhm40c