The Controversial History of Vaccines: A Conversation with Dr. Suzanne Humphries

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a nephrologist and author of "Dissolving Illusions", joins Joe Rogan to discuss her controversial research into the history and efficacy of vaccines. Some key points from their conversation:

The Origins of Dr. Humphries' Research

Dr. Humphries explains how she began questioning vaccine practices while working as a nephrologist:

"I stayed on for two years as a nephrologist in my hospital so I wasn't kicked out, I left because like my soul just couldn't hang out there anymore. And during that time even though I was kind of ostracized behind my back everybody still respected me as a nephrologist, but I still had to go and in that in that time I started doing public appearances."

She describes becoming "obsessed" with researching the history of vaccines, particularly smallpox and polio, after being challenged on these topics:

"I became obsessed with it. It was so interesting. So I was morbidly fascinated by the whole thing and about how everything I found was absolutely contrary to what the mainstream dogma is."

Challenging the Polio Vaccine Narrative

Dr. Humphries argues that the common narrative around polio and the polio vaccine is flawed:

"Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well. Polio is called different things today, whereas back in the 1940s 1950s the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The the the playing field, the goalpost, everything was changed."

She suggests that other factors like pesticide exposure may have contributed to polio-like symptoms:

"The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the the diagnosis for polio in the days and the countries that still make DDT today is where we're still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen."

Vaccine Manufacturing and Potential Contaminants

Dr. Humphries discusses how vaccines are manufactured and potential contaminants that can be introduced:

"To to you need something alive, you need some sort some sort of tissue from a living creature in order to grow these things. Well in terms of the COVID vaccine you just needed a pile of crap actually because it's made on E.coli cells and that's where you find E.coli."

She highlights the case of SV40, a monkey virus that contaminated some polio vaccines:

"SV40 was around and then Maurice Hillerman validated it later and said it came from the African green monkey kidneys. Now it's benign in the African green monkey, SV40. It is not benign in human beings."

Questioning Vaccine Efficacy and Safety

Dr. Humphries argues that the benefits of vaccines may be overstated while risks are downplayed:

"They say that our lifespan has improved as a result of medical interventions when what we show in here, what other scientists have shown, is that it's about 3.5% of the contribution from medicine goes into our extended lifespan - 3.5% based on antibiotics, vaccines etc. The rest of it was all about the revolution, the health revolution, the clean water, the shelter, the electricity, the child labor laws."

She suggests that nutrition and other factors may be more important for health:

"If they truly cared about you they would be telling you about that as a primary way of defending your body against disease and against all sorts of things that could go wrong - all sorts of things like get fit, eat healthy, and you're above everything, take supplements. You're above everything like you're in the top 1% of people that are going to do great in life when it comes to getting sick."

Censorship and Suppression of Vaccine Skepticism

Dr. Humphries describes facing censorship and attacks for her views:

"I got cancelled out of YouTube for talking about vitamin C of all things. So everything's now on Odyssey, all my videos are on Odyssey."

She argues there is a concerted effort to suppress vaccine skepticism:

"Any doubts whether or not well-founded about the safety of the vaccination program must not be allowed to exist. That's literally what it said. It's straight out of Lenin."

Conclusion

While Dr. Humphries' views on vaccines are highly controversial and disputed by mainstream medical authorities, she argues that there are important questions and nuances around vaccine history, efficacy and safety that deserve more scrutiny and open discussion. Her conversation with Joe Rogan highlights the polarized nature of the vaccine debate and the challenges of questioning established medical narratives.

Article created from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=207W1A_bJqI