The Chinook Artillery Helicopter: A Bold Military Experiment

The Chinook Artillery Helicopter: A Bold Military Experiment

In the annals of military aviation history, few concepts are as audacious as the idea of mounting artillery cannons on a helicopter. Yet, in the early 1970s, at the height of the Vietnam War, this is exactly what the United States Army set out to do. The project, which aimed to equip a CH-47 Chinook helicopter with not one, but two 105mm howitzers, represents a fascinating chapter in the evolution of aerial warfare and military technology.

The Genesis of an Audacious Idea

In December 1971, Lawrence aluron of the Advanced Concept Division within the Aircraft Weapons Division was tasked with leading a groundbreaking study. The objective was clear yet ambitious: to externally mount two artillery cannons on a Chinook helicopter, capable of engaging ground targets from the air.

This wasn't the first time the Army had contemplated such an idea. Previous experiments with large-caliber weapons on the H-21 helicopter had been conducted, but these attempts were marred by significant blast and recoil damage. Undeterred by past failures, aluron believed he could succeed where others had faltered.

A Collaborative Effort

To bring this audacious concept to life, aluron assembled a formidable team. He partnered with the US Army's Rock Island Arsenal, a facility renowned for its research and development of next-generation weapon systems. Boeing's Vertol division, specialists in vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) aircraft, was also brought on board.

This collaboration brought together expertise from various branches of the military and defense industry. It was as if the Army, Air Force, and artillery branch had come together to create an unprecedented aerial weapons platform.

The Technical Specifications

The proposed artillery system for the Chinook was nothing short of impressive:

• Armament: Two 105mm howitzers, one mounted on each side of the fuselage
• Fire Rate: Theoretical maximum of 120 rounds per minute with both guns firing, though Boeing documents cited a more realistic rate of 60 rounds per minute
• Crew: Nine artillerymen inside the Chinook
• Ammunition Capacity: 96 rounds
• Total System Weight: Approximately 14,490 pounds (6,573 kg), including guns, mounting system, and full ammo load

The XM204 Howitzer: A Key Component

At the heart of this ambitious project was the experimental XM204 howitzer. This wasn't just any ordinary cannon; it was specifically designed to address the unique challenges of being fired from a helicopter.

Key features of the XM204 included:

• Soft Recoil System: Utilized pressurized nitrogen gas to reduce recoil by 70%
• Weight Reduction: The entire system weighed 50% less than conventional 105mm howitzers
• Barrel Length: 11 feet, which posed challenges for muzzle blast management

Engineering Challenges and Solutions

Mounting artillery cannons on a helicopter presented a myriad of engineering challenges. The team had to address issues related to weight distribution, recoil management, structural integrity, and operational feasibility.

Weight and Balance

One of the primary concerns was the impact of the external load on the helicopter's performance. The guns and mounting system alone weighed over 10,000 pounds, with ammunition adding another 3,800 pounds. This additional weight had significant implications:

• Reduced the Chinook's maximum range from 200 to 100 nautical miles
• Limited loitering time over the objective to approximately 15 minutes
• Necessitated a running takeoff, limiting the types of landing zones that could be used

Recoil Management

The XM204's soft recoil system was crucial in making the concept feasible. When fired, the gun would force the barrel and breach forward using pressurized nitrogen gas. This forward momentum would help counteract the rearward force of firing, significantly reducing the impact on the helicopter.

According to calculations:

• Each gun generated about 122,000 pound-feet of force upon firing
• This would accelerate a fully loaded Chinook by approximately 0.7g (or 1.4g if both guns fired simultaneously)
• Without pilot compensation, firing a single howitzer would shift the Chinook's nose by only 2 degrees

Structural Reinforcement

To withstand the forces involved, significant structural modifications were necessary:

• Aluminum reinforced panels were added along both sides of the forward fuselage
• Half-inch thick plexiglass was installed to protect against muzzle blast
• Stress on the rotor blades increased by only 10% during firing, according to the study

Muzzle Blast Management

The muzzle blast from the 11-foot barrels proved to be more challenging than anticipated:

• Concussion and hot gases from firing were dangerously close to the cockpit
• The bright flash from the guns could potentially ruin the pilots' night vision

Operational Concept

The operational concept for this flying artillery platform was as ambitious as its technical specifications:

• The right-side gun would remain attached during flight, allowing for engagement of targets en route
• The left-side gun could be quickly detached and lowered to the ground for use as a conventional artillery piece
• Ammunition could be crimped and loaded in-flight by the onboard artillery crew
• Aiming was to be done using a simple gun sight and laser rangefinder, without complex ballistic computers

The Fate of the Project

Despite the extensive research and development, the Chinook artillery helicopter never progressed beyond scale model testing. Several factors contributed to the project's ultimate demise:

1. Performance Limitations: The additional weight and drag reduced the Chinook's maximum speed from 170 to 120 knots
2. XM204 Reliability Issues: The experimental howitzer's soft recoil system proved unreliable and inaccurate during ground testing
3. Operational Constraints: The reduced range and loitering time limited the system's tactical utility
4. Competing Priorities: Heavy-lift helicopters like the Chinook were already in high demand for logistics missions

Legacy and Lessons Learned

While the Chinook artillery helicopter never saw combat, the project yielded valuable insights into the challenges of integrating heavy weapons systems with rotary-wing aircraft. It pushed the boundaries of what was considered possible in aerial warfare and contributed to the ongoing evolution of close air support capabilities.

The concept of airborne artillery continues to fascinate military planners and engineers. Modern developments in drone technology and precision-guided munitions have opened new avenues for providing aerial fire support, building upon the ambitious vision of the Chinook artillery project.

Conclusion

The Chinook artillery helicopter project stands as a testament to the innovative spirit of military engineers and the constant quest for battlefield advantages. While it may seem outlandish by today's standards, it's important to remember that many of today's advanced weapon systems were once considered equally improbable.

As we continue to push the boundaries of military technology, the lessons learned from ambitious projects like the artillery-equipped Chinook serve as valuable reference points. They remind us that innovation often requires bold thinking and a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom, even if the end result doesn't always match the initial vision.

The story of the Chinook artillery helicopter is more than just a curious footnote in military history. It's a reminder of the ingenuity, ambition, and sometimes audacious creativity that drives technological progress in warfare. As we look to the future of military aviation and fire support, we can draw inspiration from this bold experiment of the past, always seeking new ways to enhance battlefield capabilities and protect those who serve.

Article created from: https://youtu.be/vdv56fUhQmk?feature=shared