Challenging Scientific Dogmas and the Future of Inquiry

The Limitations of Current Scientific Beliefs

The belief that science has already mapped out the basic framework of reality is widespread. This perspective assumes that all that remains is to fill in the finer details. This mindset is particularly prevalent among those who replace traditional religious beliefs with a staunch belief in science. However, this has led to a significant conflict within the scientific community itself — the clash between science as a method of inquiry and science as a belief system.

The Materialistic Worldview and Its Impact

Since the late 19th century, scientific research has largely operated under the umbrella of philosophical materialism. This worldview posits that everything in existence is material and that consciousness, purpose, and intentionality are illusions. Such a stance has not only shaped educational systems and governmental policies but also stifled much potential for innovative thinking within scientific fields.

Ten Dogmas Restricting Scientific Progress

In his book, which addresses these issues differently depending on the region ('The Science Delusion' in the UK and 'Science Set Free' in the US), Rupert Sheldrake identifies ten core dogmas holding back scientific progress:

• Nature as Mechanical: Viewing nature as purely mechanical, including humans seen as robotic entities.
• Consciousness as Non-existent: Denying any form of consciousness in non-human entities and viewing human consciousness as an illusion.
• Fixed Laws of Nature: The assumption that natural laws are constant over time and space.
• Conservation of Matter and Energy: Belief in unchanging total quantities since the Big Bang.
• Purposelessness in Nature: The idea that there are no inherent purposes or directions in natural processes.
• Material Basis for Heredity: Viewing genetic material as solely responsible for heredity.
• Memory Within Brain Matter: The notion that memories are stored physically within brain matter.
• Mind Confined to Brain: Belief that all mental activities occur strictly within one's brain.
• Impossibility of Psychic Phenomena: Dismissal of any phenomena like telepathy due to mind's confinement within physical boundaries.
• Dominance of Mechanistic Medicine: A focus on mechanistic approaches in medicine while ignoring alternative therapies.

Questioning Constants and Embracing Change

Sheldrake doesn't just critique these dogmas; he proposes an alternative view where laws of nature are seen not as fixed constants but as evolving habits. This idea draws from earlier philosophical thoughts like those from C.S. Peirce who suggested nature operates more on habitual patterns than on fixed laws. Sheldrake's hypothesis of morphic resonance suggests that similar forms (like crystals or biological beings) can influence subsequent formations across time and space without direct interaction.

Implications for Science and Medicine

If we accept even the possibility that constants like gravity or light speed could fluctuate, this opens up new avenues for research. For instance, discrepancies observed in measurements of constants might not be mere errors but indications of underlying changes in nature itself. Such an approach encourages a more dynamic interaction with data, fostering a less rigidly deterministic view of nature.

Conclusion - A Call for Renaissance in Science

The current adherence to rigid dogmatic beliefs may be inhibiting rather than advancing our understanding of the universe. By fostering an environment where questioning is encouraged, science can move beyond its current limitations. Sheldrake’s vision suggests a renaissance where science not only acknowledges but embraces changes, leading potentially to more holistic understandings both scientifically and culturally.

Article created from: https://youtu.be/sF03FN37i5w?si=1g8Uj3gbECfm71Tg